School Committee admonished by the RI Dept. of Education
February 5, 2006
On
April 5th 2005 Doris Anselmo, Director of the Office of Teacher
Certification, Rhode Island Department of Education (DOE), sent a letter
to the Little Compton School Department sharply criticizing the
Administration and the Committee for failure to comply with R.I. General
Law 16-16-24(b). Specifically, the DOE focused on the hiring of Mr. John
Pacheco, a retired educator, for one year as a part-time Administrator (click
here to see the actual letter).
The part-time Administrator's job was newly created at that time. The
law states that such a position must first be advertised and offered to
any qualified non-retired employee. If there are no takers, the
retired educator may fill the position for up to 90 days in a school
year. Additionally, the Law requires that the Retirement Board must be
notified monthly of the employment by both the School Department and Mr.
Pacheco himself.
THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT ANY OF THIS WAS EVER DONE!
Furthermore, the School Committee chaired by Ellen Kinnane continued to
employ Mr. Pacheco beyond the initial term and, apparently, continued to
ignore the legal requirements. On October 14, 2004, the Taxpayers
Association wrote a letter to Ms. Kinnane pointing this out and
requesting evidence that the law was being followed (click here to see
the actual letter). We never received an answer!
Ignorance of the Law is no excuse. We have a right, and in fact should
demand that our elected officials comply with the laws of the land. Nor
is incompetence acceptable. This same School Committee and
Administration put a budget before the voters at the last Financial Town
Meeting that: (1) resulted in a huge surplus; (2) was declared at that
time to be too small and would create in a deficit; and, (3) resulted in
a 3-evening nightmare for those who attended the meetings last Spring.
The taxpayers of Little Compton
are forever burdened with an additional 500 thousand dollar levy because
of School Committee and School Administration mistakes that were made in
the preparation of the 2005-2006 budget. Why? Another law (R.I.
General Law 16-7-23) says that the Town must fund the school no less
than it did for the previous year. The so called surplus is now part of
the base upon which the 5.5% cap is calculated and therefore sets the
stage for spending to a higher degree than would have been the case with
an honest budget.
Note: The current School Administration (Superintendent Devine and
Principal Blaess) and Joe Quinn of the School Committee are not directly
responsible for this. They are essentially "new players" that have, in
fact, commendably uncovered and made public some of the problems created
by their predecessors.
But as President Ronald Reagan once said relative to the Soviet Union,
"Trust but verify." The Taxpayers Association is pleased with the
openness of the current school administration, but we intend to watch
very closely what they do relative to hiring and setting next year's
budget. For now, the previous administration has a lot of explaining to
do.